Insights
Insights for smarter expense management
Practical tips, user stories, and financial strategies that help you track expenses, organize your finances, and make better spending decisions.
Insights
Practical tips, user stories, and financial strategies that help you track expenses, organize your finances, and make better spending decisions.
A scientific perspective on cognitive biases, decision-making, and household finance
The increasing availability of installment-based payment systems—ranging from traditional loans to modern Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services—has significantly altered consumer spending behavior. While paying cash requires an immediate financial outflow, monthly instalments distribute the cost over time, reducing the perceived burden of the purchase. Although both methods provide access to the same product, they trigger fundamentally different psychological responses. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for assessing consumer decision-making, household budgeting, and financial well-being.
A foundational concept in behavioural economics is the “pain of paying,” introduced by Prelec & Loewenstein (1998). Paying cash produces a single, salient moment of loss: the consumer feels the financial sacrifice immediately and fully. This direct temporal coupling of payment and consumption strengthens the psychological sensation of cost, often reducing impulsive purchases.
In contrast, installment plans generate temporal decoupling. Consumers enjoy immediate consumption while the financial loss is deferred across multiple months. This separation dramatically reduces the felt “pain” associated with the purchase, making the transaction psychologically easier—even when it is more expensive over time.
According to Thaler’s (1999) theory of mental accounting, individuals categorize money into psychological “budgets” such as rent, groceries, subscriptions, and discretionary spending. Monthly instalments fit neatly into these mental budgets because they resemble predictable monthly expenses. This categorization reduces the perceived size of the purchase.
A €2,500 sofa framed as “€89/month” looks psychologically smaller than a single €2,500 payment, even though the total cost may be identical or higher. This effect—known as denominator neglect—leads consumers to focus on the monthly payment rather than the overall financial commitment.
Loss aversion, one of the pillars of prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), states that people experience losses more intensely than gains of the same magnitude. Paying a large amount upfront is therefore perceived as a disproportionately painful loss.
Monthly instalments smooth the loss curve, converting one large psychological shock into many smaller losses. These smaller losses register less intensely and less consciously. This smoothing effect explains why consumers consistently prefer instalments—even when they intellectually understand the long-term cost may be higher.
A large body of research shows that individuals systematically underestimate future constraints on their financial resources.
Key mechanisms include:
Consumers believe they can “easily handle” small monthly payments, even when their future financial situation is uncertain.
Individuals underestimate future expenses and overestimate their ability to keep budgets stable over time.
Behavioural economists (Laibson, 1997) have shown that people heavily discount future costs while overvaluing immediate benefits. This makes monthly instalments extremely appealing: the present reward is tangible, the future cost feels distant and abstract.
In contrast, paying cash compresses the entire financial decision into the present moment, forcing consumers to evaluate the full cost realistically.
Installments reduce the salience of financial obligations. A one-time cash payment is highly visible and memorable. Monthly instalments, especially when automated, become background noise.
This contributes to:
Recent surveys show that BNPL users often underestimate their total owed amount by 25–40%, illustrating how low-salience payments distort financial awareness.
Monthly payments enable consumers to make aspirational purchases that align with their ideal self-image—better furniture, newer electronics, or home upgrades—without the psychological barrier of a large cash outflow.
Paying cash, however, engages the emotional regulation system more strongly. Consumers must confront trade-offs:
“If I buy this now, I cannot afford X later.”
Installment plans weaken these trade-offs, making the purchase emotionally smoother but potentially riskier.
The psychological ease created by instalments brings both benefits and risks:
Scientific research consistently shows that consumers using multiple instalment systems exhibit higher financial stress, especially when payments overlap or when promotional “0% interest” plans are used without a strategy for repayment.
The preference for monthly instalments over paying cash is deeply rooted in behavioural psychology. Installments reduce the pain of paying, exploit mental accounting habits, soften loss aversion, and take advantage of present bias. While they can support financial planning when used intentionally, they also increase the risk of overspending and long-term financial strain when used unconsciously.
Understanding the psychological biases behind installment-based purchasing is essential for designing healthier financial habits and preventing household debt escalation. Increased transparency, budgeting tools, and behavioural interventions can help consumers make more informed choices—and ensure that instalments remain a helpful tool rather than a hidden trap.
Understanding how installment plans influence your credit score can help you avoid hidden pitfalls and build a stronger financial foundation.
High-Interest vs. “0% Interest” Plans — What You Need to Know
This article breaks down how BNPL financing works, how Klarna and PayPal Credit differ from store financing, and how to use these tools without falling into debt traps.